Infosys Ltd

Introduction

Infosys is a global technology services and consulting company, providing AI-first business solutions across the software development lifecycle. Its core revenue stream is software services (₹1,47,806 Cr in FY26), complemented by a smaller products and platforms segment (₹1,013 Cr). The company serves over 1,800 clients primarily through a B2B model, with 58% of revenue derived from fixed-price contracts annual report FY26. No single client exceeds 10% of trade receivables; the top five and ten clients accounted for 12.7% and 20.5% of revenue, respectively.

The business model centres on large-scale IT outsourcing and transformation engagements. In FY26, cross-currency revenues surpassed $20 billion, with total large deal TCV reaching approximately $15 billion, of which 55% was net new work Q4 FY26 concall. A growing AI services practice—estimated above 5.5% of revenue—is organized around six value pools spanning strategy, data, process, legacy modernization, physical AI, and trust Q3 FY26 concall.

Infosys operates at scale with FY26 revenue of ₹1,48,819 Cr and an employee base of over 323,000. North America remains its largest market, though the onsite mix has declined to roughly 23%. It ranks among the top-tier Indian IT services firms, positioned as a broad-based industry leader rather than a niche player, with a diversified vertical mix led by Financial Services, Manufacturing, and a Europe geography that now contributes roughly 30% of revenue.

Valuation Context

Forensic Risk Assessment

RED FLAGS

[US Civil Settlement for Visa Fraud and B-1 Visa Misuse (2013)]

Search origin: [legal_criminal · fraud] — entity searched: Infosys

In 2013, Infosys completed a civil settlement with the U.S. Government, agreeing to pay $34 million to resolve allegations of systemic visa fraud and misuse of B-1 visas to circumvent H-1B program requirements. The company was investigated for using short-term, lower-cost B-1 business visitor visas for employees performing skilled labor that required H-1B visas. The state of Texas also received $5 million as part of the settlement. Source The allegations were corroborated by a whistleblower lawsuit that Infosys settled. Source

• Materiality: Confirmed settlement for serious misconduct involving U.S. federal authorities. While resolved a decade ago, it reflects a historical intent to circumvent immigration laws, a key operational risk for a company heavily reliant on global talent mobility.

[Massive Alleged GST Evasion Under Investigation (2024)]

Search origin: [financial_crime · money laundering investigation] — entity searched: Infosys ; [legal_criminal · crime] — entity searched: Infosys ; [regulatory · tax evasion] — entity searched: Infosys

The Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) issued a pre-show cause notice to Infosys for alleged non-payment of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on services received from its overseas branches, totaling over Rs 32,000 crore (approx. $4 billion) for the period 2017-2022. The investigation, reported in July 2024, suggests the company is liable for the tax under the reverse charge mechanism. Infosys has stated it paid all dues and believes the GST is not applicable, citing a circular from the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs. The matter is ongoing and poses a significant contingent liability. Source Source

• Materiality: Extremely material. The potential liability of $4 billion is enormous relative to the company's net profits. This represents a significant overhang that could materially impact financials if an adverse ruling is upheld, despite Infosys's confidence in its legal position.

[SEBI Action on Insider Trading by Employees (2021)]

Search origin: [regulatory · sebi order] — entity searched: Infosys ; [regulatory · insider trading] — entity searched: Infosys

In September 2021, SEBI passed an interim order against several employees of Infosys and Wipro for insider trading in the shares of Infosys. The order impounded illegal gains and restrained the individuals from the securities market. The trades were conducted using Unpublished Price Sensitive Information (UPSI) related to Infosys’s financial results. Source

• Materiality: Indicates a failure in internal controls over sensitive financial information at the employee level. While the individuals were pursued, the systemic breach of trust is a governance red flag.

[Repeated SEBI Insider Trading Actions (2024-2025)]

Search origin: [regulatory · sebi order] — entity searched: Infosys ; [regulatory · sebi penalty] — entity searched: Infosys

Multiple fresh enforcement actions confirm that insider trading remains a recurring issue. In June 2024, the CEO, Salil Parekh, settled an insider trading case with SEBI for a breach related to not having adequate controls around an account jointly held with his spouse. Source In September 2024, SEBI issued a final order in another matter of alleged insider trading in the scrip. Source In January 2025, SEBI banned two persons and impounded Rs 2.6 crore of illegal gains for insider trading. Source

• Materiality: A pattern of insider trading infractions, including one directly involving the CEO, is a serious governance deficiency. It shows a lack of robust preventative controls at the highest levels and a culture where UPSI is not sacrosanct.

AMBER FLAGS

[2019 Whistleblower Complaint Against CEO & CFO (No Wrongdoing Found)]

Search origin: [accounting_governance · whistleblower allegations] — entity searched: Infosys ; [community_flags · valuepickr] — entity searched: Infosys

In October 2019, an anonymous whistleblower group sent a letter to the Infosys board and the U.S. SEC alleging “unethical practices” by the CEO and CFO to inflate short-term revenue and profits. The complaints cited improper recognition of revenue on large contracts and bypassing standard deal reviews. The allegations caused Infosys’s US-listed shares to plunge nearly 16%, wiping out over Rs 53,000 crore in market capitalization. Source Source An internal audit committee investigation, supported by external legal counsel, found no evidence of financial impropriety or executive misconduct. The SEC’s investigation reportedly continues as of early 2020 reporting, though no public action has been taken. The CEO Salil Parekh was recused from the probe. Source

• Materiality: The CEO-level allegation, the severe market reaction, and the ongoing SEC investigation, despite an internal clean chit, warrant an amber flag. The gap between internal and regulatory closure is a concern to monitor.

[No Clear Resolution for SEC Whistleblower Probe]

Search origin: [accounting_governance · whistleblower allegations] — entity searched: Infosys

Linked to the above, the 2019 whistleblower complaint was also filed with the U.S. SEC. While Infosys’s audit committee found no evidence of wrongdoing in 2020, public reports from that time confirm the SEC investigation was still open. No formal closure or final order from the SEC has been publicly identified in the search findings. This leaves an open tail risk from a key regulatory body.

[Customs Litigation on Service Tax Applicability]

Search origin: [regulatory · court case litigation India] — entity searched: Infosys

A 2019 CESTAT (Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal) order details a dispute where Infosys appealed against the Commissioner of Central Tax. The case revolved around service tax demands and refund claims related to the classification of services. The legal proceedings highlight historical tax litigation. Source

• Materiality: An amber flag only due to the massive scale of the current GST dispute. This older case demonstrates that the company has a history of being involved in significant litigation on indirect tax matters, making adverse outcomes more likely as a matter of pattern.

[High-Profile CFO Resignation (2023)]

Search origin: [accounting_governance · CFO resignation] — entity searched: Infosys

Nilanjan Roy, the Chief Financial Officer, resigned in December 2023 and was succeeded by Jayesh Sanghrajka. Source While the resignation was announced as a personal decision to pursue external opportunities, departures of key financial stewards are always an amber flag requiring scrutiny, especially when occurring against a backdrop of other governance issues like insider trading and whistleblower probes.

[Alleged Labour Ministry Intervention on Trainee Job Cuts (2025)]

Search origin: [operational_industry · labour issues] — entity searched: Infosys ; [operational_industry · workers protest] — entity searched: Infosys

In early 2025, the Union Labour Ministry reportedly sent notices to the Karnataka government over complaints of mass layoffs of trainees by Infosys. The controversy involved claims that trainees were let go after failing internal assessments, which were contested. The company dismissed the allegations as part of its performance management process. Source

• Materiality: An amber flag for operational and reputational risk. Large-scale workforce actions, especially those drawing government scrutiny, can signal mismanagement of talent and harm the company’s employer brand.

CLEAN SIGNALS

• Auditor Tenure: B S R & Co. LLP has been the auditor for several years. No qualified or adverse opinions, or emphasis of matter, were flagged in the searches, indicating a stable and accepted accounting stance.
• Related Party Transactions: The company has a formal, detailed policy for related party transactions, and the half-yearly disclosures are publicly available and appear structured. No evidence of undisclosed or abusive RPTs was found.
• No Financial Crime Investigations: Searches across financial_crime keywords like money laundering, hawala, front-running, and benami returned no direct accusations or investigations against Infosys for perpetrating these crimes. Most results were links to Infosys’s own service offerings for financial crime compliance and fraud detection, indicating a clean record in this dimension.
• Stable Board with Independent Actions: The board has a Lead Independent Director and has shown the ability to act independently, as seen when the CEO was recused from the 2019 whistleblower probe. High-profile members like Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw retired per schedule, and new independent directors have been appointed in an orderly manner.

INFORMATION GAPS

• SEC Investigation Outcome: The final status of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s investigation into the 2019 whistleblower complaint is a concerning information gap. The absence of a public report of closure leaves a material tail risk.
• Global Subsidiary Financials: While a list of subsidiaries is available, detailed public information on the financial and legal standing of individual, material subsidiaries could not be comprehensively obtained. This is a standard gap for a large multinational but is worth noting.
• Panaya Acquisition Rationale: The 2015 acquisition of Panaya was flagged as a source of potential governance issues in historical reporting, but the current searches yielded only an announcement of a past investor call. A clear post-mortem or resolution on any shareholder concerns related to it was not immediately visible. This is a minor gap.

OVERALL RISK ASSESSMENT

• Risk Rating: ELEVATED
• Reasoning: The risk is elevated due to the convergence of a materially massive, unresolved tax demand ($4 billion), a documented pattern of insider trading failures including at the CEO level, and a historical high-profile whistleblower probe that, while internally cleared, leaves an open question on regulatory closure. These financial and governance integrity signals override the positive indicators of auditor comfort, transparent RPTs, and a clean record on organized financial crime.
• Key monitoring items: The final adjudication and any subsequent financial provisioning for the Rs 32,000 crore GST notice; any further SEBI actions on insider trading that would confirm a systemic cultural failure; and the public release of a final closure order from the U.S. SEC on the 2019 whistleblower complaint to fully retire that risk.

---

Search Scope & Methodology

The following theme × entity combinations were searched. Each finding in the report above is tagged with its [theme · keyword] origin so you can trace it back to this table.